Connecting
the chocolate supply chain from my Peace Corps service to your
mid-afternoon sugar buzz
Let's
face it. It's totally trendy to be conscious about where your food
comes from. Americans and Europeans alike are more than willing to pay a little extra for
a variety of premium items that morally connect the consumer to the
product's origin.
Fair
Trade is one of the most recognized certifications today. The logo
which can most commonly be found on coffee and chocolate products
signifies that a premium has been paid for the ingredients. Although
I cannot speak for coffee, in cocoa that premium is critical for
farmers. As it stands currently, the supply of cocoa is dwindling.
Cocoa
doesn't grow just anywhere. The “cocoa belt”, is the tropical
zone that spans 20 degrees north and south of the equator. Most cocoa
farmers (I speak for the DR) are older (60+) and today's youth, which
make up for nearly half of the population, are uninterested in taking
over the family farms for fear being poor like their parents and
grandparents. On the other end of the supply chain, chocolate
consumption worldwide increases at an incredible rate each year. What
does this all mean? Prices on all levels must increase in order to
sustain the cocoa industry.
In
a recent conference with other (Peace Corps) volunteers who work with
cocoa we had the opportunity to speak with the official liaison for
Fair Trade (FLO) in the Dominican Republic, Maria Trinidad.
Since
the message to the consumer of Fair Trade products is intended to be
ethical and the little Fair Trade logo appears on the final product,
I wanted to know if Fair Trade required a certain amount (or all) of
the ingredients in a chocolate bar (for example) to be Fair Trade
sourced. The short answer is no. In fact, Maria went as far as to say
that all ingredients in the bar that could
be Fair Trade should
be. As you may know, this is impossible. Things like sugar and
vanilla, absolutely. But that chocolate bar contains quite a few more
ingredients that are not Fair Trade. So the logo makes it all the way
to the final product even though a very small amount of the
ingredients are actually Fair Trade.
That
being said, I want to mention that cocoa is a commodity that is
purchased by the ton from origin. Large chocolate manufacturers buy
thousands of tons of cocoa beans annually and not all of them are
Fair Trade certified or from the same source. What is the likelihood
of Fair Trade beans staying separate from the non-Fair Trade? In
fact, Fair Trade uses a system called 'mass balance' when it comes to
the certified final product. This means that for every chocolate bar
made intended to be certified Fair Trade, that company must buy the
equivalent mass of cocoa under Fair Trade terms. In other words,
that's as far as Fair Trade reaches in content control of the final
certified product and that in reality that chocolate bar may not
contain Fair Trade cocoa beans at all.
Let's
talk about the premium that is paid per ton for Fair Trade cocoa
beans. In addition to the floor (minimum) price for the beans, Fair
Trade pays $400 per ton. That breaks down to $20 per quintal (a
quintal is 150 kilos). That money is paid out to the exporting
organization at origin to cover administration costs and what's left
over (?!) is distributed to the farmers. In short, the benefits are
not enough. Not to mention the initial sign-up fee of 550 Euros in
addition to the annual fee to stay certified.
Maria
says that Fair Trade is the first step for small organizations to
begin exporting. They get certified through larger organizations that
have the capacity to export with the intent that in time they will be
able to use the premiums paid out to export on their own. Here in the
Dominican Republic Fair Trade's poster child is CONOCADO, the first
organization to be Fair Trade certified in the country. CONOCADO
started out as a cooperative for small cocoa producers and has turned
into a three part mega company that is anything but small. However,
for the last two years, CONOCADO has not distributed benefits to
their cocoa farmers. They have lost more than 600 members nationwide
since 2012. Basilio Almonte, head agronomist for CONOCADO was also
present at the conference. When asked why they have failed to pay
benefits to their members, he informed me that the organization had
too many internal expenses and has not been able to distribute
anything to the cocoa farmers. On a whole other level of opaque, the
director of CONOCADO has opened his own private cocoa purchasing
business, BIOCAFCAO, putting himself in direct competition with his
employer, CONOCADO.
Maria
Trinidad, well aware of the situation at the Fair Trade poster child,
commented that although the transparency issues at CONOCADO are
unfortunate it is the responsibility of the farmers to advocate for
themselves and that Fair Trade cannot be involved in internal affairs
of the certified exporting organizations.
If
you are familiar with my job here in the DR with La Red Guaconejo,
you have probably read about Taza Chocolate and their Direct Trade
philosophy. Taza works exclusively with organic certified cocoa beans
and on top of paying a minimum of $500 per metric ton above the New
York International Commodities Exchange (ICE) price, owner Alex
Whitmore visits the organization each year in order to ensure
long-term personal relationships with the cocoa farmers. In my
previous blog post you can read a little bit about Alex's most recent
visit to the DR. What's in it for Alex, you may be asking? These
relationships and purchasing principles allow Taza to manufacture and
deliver a high quality, traceable chocolate bar with an ethical
message and a real story to the consumer. The Somerville, MA based
company is not exactly comparable to Nestle or Kraft (Mondalez). Most
famous for their stone ground Mexican style chocolate disks, Taza has
a unique market.
So
what's the problem?
Is
Fair Trade allowing consumers to believe that a $2 chocolate bar with
their logo on it is just as ethical as an artisan chocolate bar that
costs four times the price? Or will the trendiness of being “food
conscious” or in this case “chocolate conscious” make for a
saavy consumer that knows the difference?
That,
my friends, is for you all to decide but I whole heartedly encourage
you to be more aware of the origin of you next chocolate buzz.